|
|
Vioxx Recall: The
international prescription drug company
Merck announced in September 2004 the worldwide
withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib,
sold in most countries under the brand name
Vioxx, because a study showed an increased
risk of heart attack and stroke.
Vioxx
Trial: Patients
who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx
have filed litigation against Merck for
selling Vioxx even though Merck allegedly
was aware of Vioxx's dangerous
side effects. |
|
|
|
| |
|
FDA:
Vioxx Recall (rofecoxib)
Questions and Answers
|
| |
- What
action did Merck take today [September 30, 2004]?
- What
is Vioxx?
- Did
FDA require this action?
- What
action did FDA take today?
- What
should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx?
- What
are the likely long-term health effects, if any, of
taking this product?
- What
evidence supports the Public Health Advisory?
- Why
wasnt the APPROVe trial stopped earlier?
- What
did FDA know about the risk of heart attack and stroke
when it approved Vioxx?
- Is
the FDA's expedited review process putting riskier
drugs on the market?
- What
other drugs are similar to Vioxx?
- Does
todays action suggest that other drugs in the
same class are dangerous?
- Will
Vioxx be recalled?
- Can
my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for
Vioxx?
- How
can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx to FDA?
- Where
can I get more information?
|
| |
| 1.
What action did Merck take today? |
Merck
announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of Vioxx (rofecoxib). |
| |
| 2.
What is Vioxx? |
Vioxx
is a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Vioxx is also
related to the nonselective NSAIDs , such as ibuprofen and naproxen. Vioxx is
a prescription medicine used to relieve signs and symptoms of arthritis, acute
pain in adults, and painful menstrual cycles. |
| |
| 3.
Did the FDA require this action? |
No,
Merck made this decision independent of input from FDA. The Agency has not had
an opportunity to review the data from the study that was stopped in
the depth that Merck has, but agrees with the company
that there appear to be significant safety concerns for patients, particularly
those taking the drug chronically.
FDA plans to work closely with Merck to coordinate
the withdrawal of this product from the US market. |
| |
| 4.
What action did FDA take today? |
FDA
issued a public health advisory concerning the use
of Vioxx. This advisory is based on Merck & Co.,
Inc. voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx from the market due to safety concerns. |
| |
| 5.
What should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx? |
The
risk that an individual patient will suffer a heart attack or stroke related
to Vioxx is very small. We encourage people taking Vioxx to contact their physician
to discuss discontinuing use of Vioxx and alternative treatments. Any decision
about which drug product to take to treat your symptoms should be made in consultation
with your physician based on an assessment of your specific treatment needs. |
| |
| 6.
What are the likely long-term health effects, if
any, of taking this product? |
The
new study shows that Vioxx may cause an increased risk in cardiovascular events
such as heart attack and strokes during chronic use. |
| |
| 7.
What evidence supports the Public Health Advisory? |
Merck's
decision to withdraw Vioxx from the market is based
on new data from a trial called the APPROVe [ Adenomatous
Polyp Prevention on VIOXX] trial. In the APPROVe trial,
Vioxx was compared to placebo (sugar-pill). The purpose
of the trial was to see if Vioxx 25 mg was effective
in preventing the recurrence of colon polyps. This trial
was stopped early because there was an increased risk
for serious cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks
and strokes, first observed after 18 months of continuous
treatment with Vioxx compared with placebo. |
| |
| 8.
Why wasnt the APPROVe trial stopped earlier? |
The
APPROVe trial began enrollment in 2000. The trial was being monitored by an independent
data safety monitoring board (DSMB). It was not stopped earlier
because the results for the first 18 months of the
trial did not show any increased risk of confirmed cardiovascular events on Vioxx. |
| |
| 9.
What did FDA know about the risk of heart attack
and stroke when it approved Vioxx? |
The
FDA originally approved Vioxx in May 1999. The original safety database included
approximately 5000 patients on Vioxx and did not show an increased risk of heart
attack or stroke. A later study, VIGOR (VIOXX GI Outcomes Research), was primarily
designed to look at the effects of Vioxx on side effects such as stomach ulcers
and bleeding and was submitted to the FDA in June 2000.
The study showed that patients taking Vioxx had fewer
stomach ulcers and bleeding than patients taking naproxen, another NSAID, however,
the study also showed a greater number of heart attacks in patients taking Vioxx.
The VIGOR study was discussed at a February 2001 Arthritis Advisory Committee
and the new safety information from this study was added to the labeling for
Vioxx in April 2002. Merck then began to conduct longer-term
trials to obtain more data on the risk for heart
attack and stroke with chronic use of Vioxx. |
| |
| 10.
Is FDAs expedited review process putting riskier
drugs on the market? |
No.
Vioxx received a six-month priority review because the drug potentially provided
a significant therapeutic advantage over existing approved drugs due to fewer
gastrointestinal side effects, including bleeding. A product undergoing a priority
review is held to the same rigorous standards for safety, efficacy,
and quality that FDA expects from all drugs submitted
for approval. |
| |
| 11.
What other drugs are similar to Vioxx? |
Vioxx
is a COX-2 selective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Other COX-2
selective NSAIDs on the market at this time are Celebrex (celecoxib) and Bextra
(valdecoxib). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen
and naproxen. You should consult your physician to determine which treatment
is right for you. |
| |
| 12.
Does todays action suggest that other drugs in the
same class are dangerous? |
The
results of clinical studies with one drug in a given class do not necessarily
apply to other drugs in the same class. All of the NSAIDs have risks when taken
chronically, especially of gastrointestinal (stomach) bleeding, but also liver
and kidney toxicity. Patients using these drugs for a long period of time (longer
than two weeks) should be under the care of a physician. |
| |
| 13.
Will Vioxx be recalled? |
FDA
did not request a recall of Vioxx. This product is being voluntarily withdrawn
from the market by Merck. |
| |
| 14.
Can my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for
Vioxx? |
No,
Merck is initiating a market withdrawal in the United States to the pharmacy
level. This means Vioxx will no longer be available at pharmacies. |
| |
| 15.
How can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx
to FDA? |
The
FDA encourages anyone aware of a serious adverse reaction to make a MedWatch
report. You can report an adverse event in two ways:
|
|
| 16.
Where can I get more information? |
To
find out more about Vioxx from the FDA:
Visit the Drug Information web page at: www.fda.gov/cder,
or call Drug Information at: 888-INFO-FDA (888-463-6332). |
|
| Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Product Liability Lawyers |
| Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP is an over fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New
York and Nashville. For the last five years, the National Law Journal has
recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs law firms
in America. |
| For our personal injury cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist the attorneys. |
| We have represented thousands of patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients who received defective medical devices in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming. |
|
| Notice
on Practice and Statute of Limitations |
| Lieff
Cabraser attorneys provide legal advice and practice law
for clients in federal district courts throughout the
United States and in state courts where we are licensed
to practice. In states in which our lawyers are not licensed
to practice, we have affiliations with local attorneys
who serve as co-counsel with our firm. Please read our
Disclaimer. |
| Persons
seeking to preserve any potential legal claims for allegedly
dangerous and/or defective products should contact an
attorney promptly because all states have mandatory time
periods (called "statutes of limitation") within
which lawsuits must be filed. Otherwise, a person's claims
may be forever barred. In some states, the statute of
limitations period for filing personal injury claims is
only one year from the date of injury. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Trademark Notice |
| "Vioxx" is
a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx
trademark is used solely for informational purposes. |
|
|
|
Copyright © 2007 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
| |
|
|
Merck
Agrees to Resolve U.S. VIOXX® Product
Liability Lawsuits
November 9, 2007
Merck & Co., Inc.
announced that
it has entered into
an agreement to resolve
state and federal myocardial
infarction (MI) and
ischemic stroke claims
already filed against
the Company in the
United States. More... |
|
|
|
|