|
|
On
September 30, 2004, the international prescription
drug company Merck announced the worldwide withdrawal
of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib, sold
in most countries under the brand name Vioxx,
because a study showed an increased risk of
heart attack and stroke. Patients who have suffered
injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation
against Merck for failing to recall the drug
when it first learned of Vioxx's dangerous side
effects.
To contact in confidence an experienced personal
injury attorney at Lieff Cabraser working on
the Vioxx lawsuit, click
here. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
painkiller Vioxx was marketed throughout the
world, sold in many countries under the name
Vioxx and in others as Ceoxx. Lieff Cabraser
is working with attorneys and solicitors in:
Argentina
Austria
Canada
Ireland
Italy
South Africa
United
Kingdom
and other countries to bring litigation against
Merck in U.S. courts for patients suffering
heart attacks and strokes from Vioxx. If you
are visiting this website from outside the U.S.,
please click here
to contact an attorney regarding your experiences
with Vioxx or Ceoxx. |
|
|
|
| |
|
FDA:
Vioxx Recall (rofecoxib)
Questions and Answers
|
| |
- What
action did Merck take today [September 30, 2004]?
- What
is Vioxx?
- Did
FDA require this action?
- What
action did FDA take today?
- What
should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx?
- What
are the likely long-term health effects, if any, of
taking this product?
- What
evidence supports the Public Health Advisory?
- Why
wasnt the APPROVe trial stopped earlier?
- What
did FDA know about the risk of heart attack and stroke
when it approved Vioxx?
- Is
the FDA's expedited review process putting riskier
drugs on the market?
- What
other drugs are similar to Vioxx?
- Does
todays action suggest that other drugs in the
same class are dangerous?
- Will
Vioxx be recalled?
- Can
my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for
Vioxx?
- How
can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx to FDA?
- Where
can I get more information?
|
| |
| 1.
What action did Merck take today? |
Merck
announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of Vioxx
(rofecoxib).
|
|
|
| 2.
What is Vioxx? |
Vioxx
is a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drug (NSAID). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective
NSAIDs , such as ibuprofen and naproxen. Vioxx is
a prescription medicine used to relieve signs and
symptoms of arthritis, acute pain in adults, and painful
menstrual cycles.
|
| |
| 3.
Did the FDA require this action? |
No, Merck made this decision independent of input
from FDA. The Agency has not had an opportunity to
review the data from the study that was stopped in
the depth that Merck has, but agrees with the company
that there appear to be significant safety concerns
for patients, particularly those taking the drug chronically.
FDA plans to work closely with Merck to coordinate
the withdrawal of this product from the US market.
|
| |
| 4.
What action did FDA take today? |
FDA
issued a public health advisory concerning the use
of Vioxx. This advisory is based on Merck & Co.,
Inc. voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx from the market
due to safety concerns.
|
|
|
| 5.
What should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx? |
The
risk that an individual patient will suffer a heart
attack or stroke related to Vioxx is very small. We
encourage people taking Vioxx to contact their physician
to discuss discontinuing use of Vioxx and alternative
treatments. Any decision about which drug product
to take to treat your symptoms should be made in consultation
with your physician based on an assessment of your
specific treatment needs.
|
| |
| 6.
What are the likely long-term health effects, if
any, of taking this product? |
The
new study shows that Vioxx may cause an increased
risk in cardiovascular events such as heart attack
and strokes during chronic use.
|
| |
| 7.
What evidence supports the Public Health Advisory? |
Merck's
decision to withdraw Vioxx from the market is based
on new data from a trial called the APPROVe [ Adenomatous
Polyp Prevention on VIOXX] trial. In the APPROVe trial,
Vioxx was compared to placebo (sugar-pill). The purpose
of the trial was to see if Vioxx 25 mg was effective
in preventing the recurrence of colon polyps. This trial
was stopped early because there was an increased risk
for serious cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks
and strokes, first observed after 18 months of continuous
treatment with Vioxx compared with placebo.
|
| |
| 8.
Why wasnt the APPROVe trial stopped earlier? |
The
APPROVe trial began enrollment in 2000. The trial
was being monitored by an independent data safety
monitoring board (DSMB). It was not stopped earlier
because the results for the first 18 months of the
trial did not show any increased risk of confirmed
cardiovascular events on Vioxx.
|
| |
| 9.
What did FDA know about the risk of heart attack
and stroke when it approved Vioxx? |
The
FDA originally approved Vioxx in May 1999. The original
safety database included approximately 5000 patients
on Vioxx and did not show an increased risk of heart
attack or stroke. A later study, VIGOR (VIOXX GI Outcomes
Research), was primarily designed to look at the effects
of Vioxx on side effects such as stomach ulcers and
bleeding and was submitted to the FDA in June 2000.
The study showed that patients taking Vioxx had fewer
stomach ulcers and bleeding than patients taking naproxen,
another NSAID, however, the study also showed a greater
number of heart attacks in patients taking Vioxx.
The VIGOR study was discussed at a February 2001 Arthritis
Advisory Committee and the new safety information
from this study was added to the labeling for Vioxx
in April 2002. Merck then began to conduct longer-term
trials to obtain more data on the risk for heart attack
and stroke with chronic use of Vioxx.
|
| |
| 10.
Is FDAs expedited review process putting riskier
drugs on the market? |
No.
Vioxx received a six-month priority review because
the drug potentially provided a significant therapeutic
advantage over existing approved drugs due to fewer
gastrointestinal side effects, including bleeding.
A product undergoing a priority review is held to
the same rigorous standards for safety, efficacy,
and quality that FDA expects from all drugs submitted
for approval.
|
| |
| 11.
What other drugs are similar to Vioxx? |
Vioxx
is a COX-2 selective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drug (NSAID). Other COX-2 selective NSAIDs on the
market at this time are Celebrex (celecoxib) and Bextra
(valdecoxib). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective
NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen and naproxen. You should
consult your physician to determine which treatment
is right for you.
|
| |
| 12.
Does todays action suggest that other drugs in the
same class are dangerous? |
The
results of clinical studies with one drug in a given
class do not necessarily apply to other drugs in the
same class. All of the NSAIDs have risks when taken
chronically, especially of gastrointestinal (stomach)
bleeding, but also liver and kidney toxicity. Patients
using these drugs for a long period of time (longer
than two weeks) should be under the care of a physician.
|
| |
| 13.
Will Vioxx be recalled? |
FDA
did not request a recall of Vioxx. This product is
being voluntarily withdrawn from the market by Merck.
|
| |
| 14.
Can my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for
Vioxx? |
No,
Merck is initiating a market withdrawal in the United
States to the pharmacy level. This means Vioxx will
no longer be available at pharmacies.
|
| |
| 15.
How can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx
to FDA? |
The
FDA encourages anyone aware of a serious adverse reaction
to make a MedWatch report. You can report an adverse
event in two ways:
|
|
| 16.
Where can I get more information? |
To
find out more about Vioxx from the FDA:
Visit the Drug Information web page at: www.fda.gov/cder,
or call Drug Information at: 888-INFO-FDA ).
|
| |
|
| Contact
Lieff Cabraser |
| If
you or a family member have suffered a serious injury
or a loved one died after being prescribed Vioxx, you
may be eligible to file a claim against Merck. |
| Please
click here to contact an attorney
at Lieff Cabraser to discuss your legal rights at no cost
or obligation. We will handle all inquiries with
the strictest confidentiality and sensitivity. |
| We
also welcome inquiries from counsel considering referring
a case. Lieff Cabraser has strong relations with the plaintiffs
bar across the United States. |
| Lieff
Cabraser: Experienced Product Liability Injury Lawyers |
| Founded
in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is
a nearly sixty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco,
New York, Washington, D.C., Beverly Hills, and Nashville.
In 2003 and 2004, the National Law Journal recognized
Lieff Cabraser as one of the top 20 plaintiffs law
firms in America. |
| For
our personal injury cases, we bring a team of experienced
lawyers. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate.
In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants,
scientific analysts and case clerks to assist the attorneys. |
| We
have represented thousands of patients who ingested prescription
drugs with dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients
who received defective medical devices in personal injury
lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska,
Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana,
Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland,
Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina,
North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New
Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania,
Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia,
Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming. |
| We
look forward to communicating with you and answering any
questions you may have. To learn more about the competitive
advantages our firm offers clients in personal injury
and products liability cases, click
here. |
| Notice
on Practice and Statute of Limitations |
| Lieff
Cabraser attorneys provide legal advice and practice law
for clients in federal district courts throughout the
United States and in state courts where we are licensed
to practice. In states in which our lawyers are not licensed
to practice, we have affiliations with local attorneys
who serve as co-counsel with our firm. Please read our
Disclaimer. |
| Persons
seeking to preserve any potential legal claims for allegedly
dangerous and/or defective products should contact an
attorney promptly because all states have mandatory time
periods (called "statutes of limitation") within
which lawsuits must be filed. Otherwise, a person's claims
may be forever barred. In some states, the statute of
limitations period for filing personal injury claims is
only one year from the date of injury. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Trademark
Notice |
| "Vioxx"
is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck,
and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational
purposes. |
|
|
|
Copyright
© 2004-2005 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP
|
| |
|
|
"10
Voters on Panel Backing Pain Pills Had Industry
Ties"
New York Times, Feb. 25, 2005
Ten of the 32 government drug advisers who last
week endorsed continued marketing of the huge-selling
pain pills Celebrex, Bextra and Vioxx have consulted
in recent years for the drugs' makers, according
to disclosures in medical journals and other public
records. If the 10 advisers had not cast their
votes, the committee would have voted 12 to 8
that Bextra should be withdrawn and 14 to 8 that
Vioxx should not return to the market. The 10
advisers with company ties voted 9 to 1 to keep
Bextra on the market and 9 to 1 for Vioxx's return.
Researchers with ties to industry commonly serve
on FDA advisory panels, but their presence has
long been a contentious issue. The agency has
said it tries to balance expertise - often found
among those who have conducted clinical trials
of the drugs in question or otherwise studied
them - with potential conflicts of interest.
Click here to read more. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Lieff
Cabraser has participated in twenty-three $100
million-plus settlements and verdicts. To read
a summary, click here. |
|
|
|
|
|

Click here to read
recent press articles on the Vioxx recall and
Vioxx lawsuits. |
|
|
|
|
|

Read about key events in the Vioxx recall and
Vioxx lawsuit by clicking
here. |
|
|
|
|