Graphic: Vioxx Legal Resources.com

Image: Gavel and Law Books


Graphic: Summary tab
On September 30, 2004, the international prescription drug company Merck announced the worldwide withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib, sold in most countries under the brand name Vioxx, because a study showed an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. Patients who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation against Merck for failing to recall the drug when it first learned of Vioxx's dangerous side effects.

To contact in confidence an experienced personal injury attorney at Lieff Cabraser working on the Vioxx lawsuit, click here.


Graphic: International
The painkiller Vioxx was marketed throughout the world, sold in many countries under the name Vioxx and in others as Ceoxx. Lieff Cabraser is working with attorneys and solicitors in:

Argentine flag Argentina
Flag Austria Austria
Flag Canada Canada
Flag Ireland Ireland
Flag Italy Italy
Flag South Africa South Africa
Flag United Kingdom United
         Kingdom

and other countries to bring litigation against Merck in U.S. courts for patients suffering heart attacks and strokes from Vioxx. If you are visiting this website from outside the U.S., please click here to contact an attorney regarding your experiences with Vioxx or Ceoxx.

 


FDA: Vioxx Recall (rofecoxib)
Questions and Answers

  
  1. What action did Merck take today [September 30, 2004]?
  2. What is Vioxx?
  3. Did FDA require this action?
  4. What action did FDA take today?
  5. What should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx?
  6. What are the likely long-term health effects, if any, of taking this product?
  7. What evidence supports the Public Health Advisory?
  8. Why wasn’t the APPROVe trial stopped earlier?
  9. What did FDA know about the risk of heart attack and stroke when it approved Vioxx?
  10. Is the FDA's expedited review process putting riskier drugs on the market?
  11. What other drugs are similar to Vioxx?
  12. Does today’s action suggest that other drugs in the same class are dangerous?
  13. Will Vioxx be recalled?
  14. Can my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for Vioxx?
  15. How can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx to FDA?
  16. Where can I get more information?
          
1.  What action did Merck take today?

          Merck announced a voluntary worldwide withdrawal of Vioxx (rofecoxib).

           
2. What is Vioxx?

          Vioxx is a COX-2 selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective NSAIDs , such as ibuprofen and naproxen. Vioxx is a prescription medicine used to relieve signs and symptoms of arthritis, acute pain in adults, and painful menstrual cycles.

  
3.  Did the FDA require this action?

          No, Merck made this decision independent of input from FDA. The Agency has not had an opportunity to review the data from the study that was stopped in the depth that Merck has, but agrees with the company that there appear to be significant safety concerns for patients, particularly those taking the drug chronically.
          FDA plans to work closely with Merck to coordinate the withdrawal of this product from the US market.         

          
4.  What action did FDA take today?

          FDA issued a public health advisory concerning the use of Vioxx. This advisory is based on Merck & Co., Inc. voluntarily withdrawing Vioxx from the market due to safety concerns.

         
5.  What should I do if I am currently taking Vioxx?

          The risk that an individual patient will suffer a heart attack or stroke related to Vioxx is very small. We encourage people taking Vioxx to contact their physician to discuss discontinuing use of Vioxx and alternative treatments. Any decision about which drug product to take to treat your symptoms should be made in consultation with your physician based on an assessment of your specific treatment needs.

          
6.  What are the likely long-term health effects, if any, of taking this product?

          The new study shows that Vioxx may cause an increased risk in cardiovascular events such as heart attack and strokes during chronic use.

          
7.  What evidence supports the Public Health Advisory?
          Merck's decision to withdraw Vioxx from the market is based on new data from a trial called the APPROVe [ Adenomatous Polyp Prevention on VIOXX] trial. In the APPROVe trial, Vioxx was compared to placebo (sugar-pill). The purpose of the trial was to see if Vioxx 25 mg was effective in preventing the recurrence of colon polyps. This trial was stopped early because there was an increased risk for serious cardiovascular events, such as heart attacks and strokes, first observed after 18 months of continuous treatment with Vioxx compared with placebo.
          
8.  Why wasn’t the APPROVe trial stopped earlier?          

          The APPROVe trial began enrollment in 2000. The trial was being monitored by an independent data safety monitoring board (DSMB). It was not stopped earlier because the results for the first 18 months of the trial did not show any increased risk of confirmed cardiovascular events on Vioxx.

          
9.  What did FDA know about the risk of heart attack and stroke when it approved Vioxx?

          The FDA originally approved Vioxx in May 1999. The original safety database included approximately 5000 patients on Vioxx and did not show an increased risk of heart attack or stroke. A later study, VIGOR (VIOXX GI Outcomes Research), was primarily designed to look at the effects of Vioxx on side effects such as stomach ulcers and bleeding and was submitted to the FDA in June 2000. The study showed that patients taking Vioxx had fewer stomach ulcers and bleeding than patients taking naproxen, another NSAID, however, the study also showed a greater number of heart attacks in patients taking Vioxx. The VIGOR study was discussed at a February 2001 Arthritis Advisory Committee and the new safety information from this study was added to the labeling for Vioxx in April 2002. Merck then began to conduct longer-term trials to obtain more data on the risk for heart attack and stroke with chronic use of Vioxx.

          
10.  Is FDA’s expedited review process putting riskier drugs on the market?

          No. Vioxx received a six-month priority review because the drug potentially provided a significant therapeutic advantage over existing approved drugs due to fewer gastrointestinal side effects, including bleeding. A product undergoing a priority review is held to the same rigorous standards for safety, efficacy, and quality that FDA expects from all drugs submitted for approval.

          
11.  What other drugs are similar to Vioxx?

          Vioxx is a COX-2 selective, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). Other COX-2 selective NSAIDs on the market at this time are Celebrex (celecoxib) and Bextra (valdecoxib). Vioxx is also related to the nonselective NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen and naproxen. You should consult your physician to determine which treatment is right for you.

          
12. Does today’s action suggest that other drugs in the same class are dangerous?

          The results of clinical studies with one drug in a given class do not necessarily apply to other drugs in the same class. All of the NSAIDs have risks when taken chronically, especially of gastrointestinal (stomach) bleeding, but also liver and kidney toxicity. Patients using these drugs for a long period of time (longer than two weeks) should be under the care of a physician.

          
13.  Will Vioxx be recalled?

          FDA did not request a recall of Vioxx. This product is being voluntarily withdrawn from the market by Merck.

          
14. Can my pharmacist continue to fill my prescription for Vioxx?

          No, Merck is initiating a market withdrawal in the United States to the pharmacy level. This means Vioxx will no longer be available at pharmacies.

          
15.  How can I report a serious side effect with Vioxx to FDA?

          The FDA encourages anyone aware of a serious adverse reaction to make a MedWatch report. You can report an adverse event in two ways:

 
16.  Where can I get more information?

To find out more about Vioxx from the FDA:
Visit the Drug Information web page at: www.fda.gov/cder, or call Drug Information at: 888-INFO-FDA ).

  

Contact Lieff Cabraser
          If you or a family member have suffered a serious injury or a loved one died after being prescribed Vioxx, you may be eligible to file a claim against Merck.
          Please click here to contact an attorney at Lieff Cabraser to discuss your legal rights at no cost or obligation. We will handle all inquiries with the strictest confidentiality and sensitivity.
          We also welcome inquiries from counsel considering referring a case. Lieff Cabraser has strong relations with the plaintiffs’ bar across the United States.
Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Product Liability Injury Lawyers
          Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is a nearly sixty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York, Washington, D.C., Beverly Hills, and Nashville. In 2003 and 2004, the National Law Journal recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top 20 plaintiffs’ law firms in America.
          For our personal injury cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist the attorneys.
          We have represented thousands of patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients who received defective medical devices in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.
          We look forward to communicating with you and answering any questions you may have. To learn more about the competitive advantages our firm offers clients in personal injury and products liability cases, click here.
Notice on Practice and Statute of Limitations
          Lieff Cabraser attorneys provide legal advice and practice law for clients in federal district courts throughout the United States and in state courts where we are licensed to practice. In states in which our lawyers are not licensed to practice, we have affiliations with local attorneys who serve as co-counsel with our firm. Please read our Disclaimer.
          Persons seeking to preserve any potential legal claims for allegedly dangerous and/or defective products should contact an attorney promptly because all states have mandatory time periods (called "statutes of limitation") within which lawsuits must be filed. Otherwise, a person's claims may be forever barred. In some states, the statute of limitations period for filing personal injury claims is only one year from the date of injury.

Images: Supreme Court, Law Books, Scales and pill images
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
E-mail: mail
Firm Website: http://www.lieffcabraser.com

Trademark Notice
          "Vioxx" is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational purposes.

Copyright © 2004-2005 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Graphic: Latest News
"10 Voters on Panel Backing Pain Pills Had Industry Ties"
New York Times, Feb. 25, 2005

Ten of the 32 government drug advisers who last week endorsed continued marketing of the huge-selling pain pills Celebrex, Bextra and Vioxx have consulted in recent years for the drugs' makers, according to disclosures in medical journals and other public records. If the 10 advisers had not cast their votes, the committee would have voted 12 to 8 that Bextra should be withdrawn and 14 to 8 that Vioxx should not return to the market. The 10 advisers with company ties voted 9 to 1 to keep Bextra on the market and 9 to 1 for Vioxx's return.
  
Researchers with ties to industry commonly serve on FDA advisory panels, but their presence has long been a contentious issue. The agency has said it tries to balance expertise - often found among those who have conducted clinical trials of the drugs in question or otherwise studied them - with potential conflicts of interest.
  
Click here to read more.


Graphic: Verdicts & Settlements header
Lieff Cabraser has participated in twenty-three $100 million-plus settlements and verdicts. To read a summary, click here.


Graphic: Press Articles
News
Click here to read recent press articles on the Vioxx recall and Vioxx lawsuits.


Graphic: Timeline
Timeline
Read about key events in the Vioxx recall and Vioxx lawsuit by clicking here.



Vioxx Recall Lawsuits and Vioxx Side Effects: 2004 Update News

vioxxlegalresources.com v 4_3