Graphic: Vioxx Legal Resources.com

Image: Gavel and Law Books


Graphic: Summary tab
On September 30, 2004, the international prescription drug company Merck announced the worldwide withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib, sold in most countries under the brand name Vioxx, because a study showed an increased risk of heart attack and stroke. Patients who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation against Merck for failing to recall the drug when it first learned of Vioxx's dangerous side effects.

To contact in confidence an experienced personal injury attorney at Lieff Cabraser working on the Vioxx lawsuit, click here.


Graphic: International
The painkiller Vioxx was marketed throughout the world, sold in many countries under the name Vioxx and in others as Ceoxx. Lieff Cabraser is working with attorneys and solicitors in:

Argentine flag Argentina
Flag Austria Austria
Flag Canada Canada
Flag Ireland Ireland
Flag Italy Italy
Flag South Africa South Africa
Flag United Kingdom United
         Kingdom

and other countries to bring litigation against Merck in U.S. courts for patients suffering heart attacks and strokes from Vioxx. If you are visiting this website from outside the U.S., please click here to contact an attorney regarding your experiences with Vioxx or Ceoxx.

 


Lieff Cabraser's
Competitive Advantages

          

          Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is a national plaintiffs’ law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York, Washington, D.C., Beverly Hills and Nashville.
          We have a team of partners, associates, legal assistants and nurses with years of experience in injury cases who are dedicated to advancing our clients’ interests. We believe we offer our clients the following advantages:
Premier National Reputation
          With nearly 60 lawyers in five offices, Lieff Cabraser is among the largest law firms in the United States that represents only plaintiffs. Our firm enjoys a national reputation for professional integrity and the efficient and responsible prosecution of our clients’ claims. We possess sophisticated legal skills and the financial resources necessary for the handling of complex cases.
          We are proud that the successes of our firm have repeatedly been recognized by independent publications. In 2003 and 2004, the National Law Journal selected our firm as one of the top 20 plaintiffs’ law firms in the nation. Elizabeth J. Cabraser has repeatedly been recognized by the National Law Journal as one of the top attorneys in the United States. In 2004, The Corporate Legal Times named Ms. Cabraser to its list of the five best plaintiffs’ attorneys in America. In 2002, Steven E. Fineman, the Managing Partner of Lieff Cabraser, was selected by the National Law Journal as one of the nation’s most successful young litigators.
Landmark Recoveries
          Since 1992, Lieff Cabraser has litigated 23 separate cases in which $100 million or more in jury verdicts were rendered or settlements were reached, including 11 cases valued at $1 billion or more. We have successfully represented clients across America in many of the most prominent personal injury and products liability cases in the U.S. over the past decade.
          For example, the United States District Court appointed us to the Plaintiffs’ Management Committee to organize and direct all Fen-Phen cases filed in federal court. The case resulted in a $4.75 billion class action settlement that received final judicial approval in 2002. Since the recall of Fen-Phen in 1997, we have represented hundreds of patients in individual lawsuits who have developed serious illnesses including primary pulmonary hypertension and heart valve damage. We continue to dedicate substantial resources to our Fen Phen clients and are available for confidential consultations with anyone who ingested these drugs, sold as Redux and Pondimin.
Experienced Trial Attorneys
          We vigorously litigate the rights of our clients, bringing claims to trial when necessary to achieve justice. Already this year, Lieff Cabraser attorneys commenced trial in three separate courts across America.
          Currently, we are prosecuting multiple cases involving catastrophic injuries and death claims claims for clients injured, or the families of loved ones who have died, by unsafe sports utility vehicles, pickup trucks, 15-passenger vans and heavy trucks. In the 15-passenger van and SUV lawsuits, plaintiffs allege that the vehicles were defectively designed because they pose an unreasonable risk of rolling over during foreseeable driving conditions. We also represent clients in several other individual vehicle injury lawsuits, including personal injury lawsuits based on allegations that certain models of the Jeep Grand Cherokee are defectively designed because the vehicle can shift suddenly from park into reverse, even when the engine is not running.
          Recent trials by Lieff Cabraser that have received widespread media attention include the following:
  • In re Tri-State Crematory. On March 1, 2004, trial began in federal court in Georgia on behalf of the bereaved families whose relatives’ bodies were desecrated or improperly cremated by the Tri-State Crematory in Noble, Georgia. The lawsuit sought damages from Tri-State Crematory and the funeral homes with which it did business. One week into trial, settlements were reached with all funeral home defendants and brought the settlement total to approximately $37 million. The Marsh defendants, the operators of Tri-State Crematory, however, withdrew from the tentatively approved settlement. Trial on the class members' claims against the Marsh defendants began in August 2004. Soon thereafter, the Marsh defendants entered into a $80 million settlement with plaintiffs. As part of the settlement, all buildings on the Tri-State property will be razed. Lieff Cabraser served as co-lead trial counsel, with partners Elizabeth Cabraser and Kathryn E. Barnett leading the trial team. Ms. Barnett gave theng statement for plaintiffs.

  • Claghorn v. Edsaco. In April 2002, a federal jury returned a $170.7 million verdict in an investor fraud case in favor of the plaintiffs. Richard M. Heimann of Lieff Cabraser conducted the trial for plaintiffs. Following the Edsaco trial, the parties reached a settlement of the action on favorable monetary terms to the class, which included Edsaco’s relinquishment of its right to appeal and the plaintiffs' agreement to vacate the jury verdict. Commenting on Lieff Cabraser’s trial work, the Judge stated:

    “[C]ounsel for the plaintiffs did a very good job in a very tough situation of achieving an excellent recovery for the class here. You were opposed by extremely capable lawyers. It was an uphill battle. There were some complicated questions, and then there was the tricky issue of actually collecting anything in the end. . . [T]he recovery that was achieved for the class in this second trial is remarkable, almost a hundred percent.”
Individual Attention and a Wealth of Resources for Each Client
          Providing superior service to our clients and working closely with our clients throughout every stage of the litigation is fundamental to how our firm operates. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate to see his or her case through to resolution.
          In addition, we have on staff a team of nurses, legal assistants and a scientific advisor, all experienced in personal injury lawsuits. We also have relationships with top experts in the fields of medicine, surgery, pharmacology, automotive safety, industrial safety, aviation, product design and accident and disaster reconstruction.
Advancing the Interests of our Client is Paramount
          Once we accept a personal injury case, we zealously pursue as favorable a settlement or recovery at trial for our clients as permitted under the law. We are committed to bringing all of our resources to bear to ensure justice for our clients.
          The leadership we displayed in the Sulzer hip and knee litigation is characteristic of our determination and tenacity in advancing our clients’ interests. In December 2000, Sulzer Orthopedics, Inc., recalled almost 30,000 hip implants. Almost a year later, Sulzer announced that it had reached an approximately $700 million settlement with certain plaintiffs’ counsel. Utilizing our financial expertise to evaluate the insurance policies and other assets available to Sulzer, we strongly objected to the settlement proposed by Sulzer. Subsequently, we helped negotiate a revised settlement with Sulzer valued at more than $1 billion which the court approved in May 2002.
Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Product Liability Lawyers
          Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is a nearly sixty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York, Washington, D.C., Beverly Hills, and Nashville. In 2003 and 2004, the National Law Journal recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top 20 plaintiffs’ law firms in America.
          For our personal injury cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist the attorneys.
          We have represented thousands of patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients who received defective medical devices in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.
          We look forward to communicating with you and answering any questions you may have. To learn more about the competitive advantages our firm offers clients in personal injury and products liability cases, click here.
Contact Lieff Cabraser
          To contact a Lieff Cabraser attorney experienced in personal injury litigation, please click here. There is no charge or obligation for our review of your claim.

Note: This summary of our personal injury and trial experience is for informational purposes only and does not and cannot constitute legal advice. The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions that should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. Before you decide to retain us, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. Lieff Cabraser does not offer any guarantee of case results. Please read our disclaimer.

Images: Supreme Court, Law Books, Scales and pill images
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
E-mail: mail
Firm Website: http://www.lieffcabraser.com

Trademark Notice
          "Vioxx" is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational purposes.

Copyright © 2004-2005 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Graphic: Latest News
"Banned Report on Vioxx Published" Los Angeles Times, Jan. 25, 2005
 
A report on Vioxx risks previously blocked by the FDA was published online Monday after the agency withdrew its opposition. The study found that as many as 140,000 cases of heart disease in the United States and as many as 56,000 deaths were caused by the painkiller Vioxx during the five years that it was on the market.
  
To read more press articles on the Vioxx recall and Vioxx class action lawsuit, click here.


Graphic: Verdicts & Settlements header
Lieff Cabraser has participated in twenty-three $100 million-plus settlements and verdicts. To read a summary, click here.


Graphic: Press Articles
News
Click here to read recent press articles on the Vioxx recall and Vioxx lawsuits.


Graphic: Timeline
Timeline
Read about key events in the Vioxx recall and Vioxx lawsuit by clicking here.



Vioxx Recall Lawsuits and Vioxx Side Effects: 2004 Update News

vioxxlegalresources.com v 4_3