Graphic: Vioxx Legal Resources.com
Offices

Image: Gavel and Law Books
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer


Graphic: Summary tab
Vioxx Recall: The international prescription drug company Merck announced in September 2004 the worldwide withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib, sold in most countries under the brand name Vioxx, because a study showed an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

Vioxx Trial: Patients who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation against Merck for selling Vioxx even though Merck allegedly was aware of Vioxx's dangerous side effects.


 


Press Articles
2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | Timeline
Below are summaries of press articles on the Vioxx trials and Vioxx class action. For a concise review of the Vioxx recall and how patients with Vioxx side effects may file a Vioxx lawsuit and obtain compensation, please visit our main page.
  
December 17, 2001
Businessweek, "Merck Could Use a Few Pep Pills"
         Merck & Co. has a history of going its own way in the drug industry. It was the first big drugmaker to buy a pharmacy- benefits management business, now called Merck-Medco, back in 1994. It has pushed aggressively into risky new research fields, conducting one of the biggest projects to find an HIV vaccine. And while big rivals such as Pfizer Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. have tried to keep their new-drug pipelines flowing by pulling off major mergers or striking expensive development deals with smaller outfits, Merck Chairman and CEO Raymond V. Gilmartin has relied largely on the company's vaunted research labs.
         Wall Street, however, is now questioning that independent streak as Merck enters a critical period. Patents on several of its blockbuster drugs have been expiring, exposing them to competition from cheap, generic knockoffs. At the same time, the company's pipeline looks alarmingly thin. Merck had counted on its second-biggest product, arthritis drug Vioxx, to help it through this rough patch, but now its fast growth is stalling.
          Part of a new class of painkillers called Cox-2 inhibitors, Vioxx was launched in 1999 on the heels of a similar drug, Celebrex, now owned by Pharmacia. Both drugs were immediate hits. Then, last year, a study by Merck showed how easy Vioxx was on stomachs, the drug's main selling point, but also indicated that patients taking Vioxx were more prone to heart attacks than patients taking an older, rival, drug. Merck believes that Vioxx doesn't cause heart problems -- that instead the older drug may actually help protect the heart -- but a study to prove that point has not been done yet. So in September the Food & Drug Administration warned the company that its marketing must acknowledge that it is unclear whether Vioxx poses a cardiac risk.
 
December 2001
Consumer Reports on Health, "The COX-2 controversy. Are newer arthritis drugs safer?"
          The newest class of arthritis drugs, called COX-2 inhibitors, is supposedly easier on the stomach than standard medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). That notion has made them by far the best-selling prescription pain relievers. But only one of two large, recent clinical trials clearly supported that idea - and that same trial raised the possibility that the COX-2 drugs may increase the risk of heart attack and stroke. More...

Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Product Liability Lawyers
Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is an over fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. For the last five years, the National Law Journal has recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs’ law firms in America.
For our personal injury cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist the attorneys.
We have represented thousands of patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients who received defective medical devices in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.

Images: Supreme Court, Law Books, Scales and pill images
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Trademark Notice
"Vioxx" is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational purposes.

Copyright © 2007 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Graphic: Latest News
Merck Agrees to Resolve U.S. VIOXX® Product Liability Lawsuits
November 9, 2007
 
Merck & Co., Inc. announced that it has entered into an agreement to resolve state and federal myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke claims already filed against the Company in the United States. More...


Graphic: Verdicts & Settlements header


Graphic: Press Articles


Graphic: Timeline