|
|
Vioxx Recall: The
international prescription drug company
Merck announced in September 2004 the worldwide
withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib,
sold in most countries under the brand name
Vioxx, because a study showed an increased
risk of heart attack and stroke.
Vioxx
Trial: Patients
who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx
have filed litigation against Merck for
selling Vioxx even though Merck allegedly
was aware of Vioxx's dangerous
side effects. |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| Below are summaries of press articles on the Vioxx trials and Vioxx class action. For a concise review of the Vioxx recall and how patients with Vioxx side effects may file a Vioxx lawsuit and obtain compensation, please visit our main page. |
|
| |
| December 17, 2001 |
Businessweek, "Merck Could Use a Few Pep Pills" |
Merck & Co. has a history of going its own way in the drug industry. It was the first big drugmaker to buy a pharmacy- benefits management business, now called Merck-Medco, back in 1994. It has pushed aggressively into risky new research fields, conducting one of the biggest projects to find an HIV vaccine. And while big rivals such as Pfizer Inc. and Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. have tried to keep their new-drug pipelines flowing by pulling off major mergers or striking expensive development deals with smaller outfits, Merck Chairman and CEO Raymond V. Gilmartin has relied largely on the company's vaunted research labs.
Wall Street, however, is now questioning that independent streak as Merck enters a critical period. Patents on several of its blockbuster drugs have been expiring, exposing them to competition from cheap, generic knockoffs. At the same time, the company's pipeline looks alarmingly thin. Merck had counted on its second-biggest product, arthritis drug Vioxx, to help it through this rough patch, but now its fast growth is stalling.
Part of a new class of painkillers called Cox-2 inhibitors, Vioxx was launched in 1999 on the heels of a similar drug, Celebrex, now owned by Pharmacia. Both drugs were immediate hits. Then, last year, a study by Merck showed how easy Vioxx was on stomachs, the drug's main selling point, but also indicated that patients taking Vioxx were more prone to heart attacks than patients taking an older, rival, drug. Merck believes that Vioxx doesn't cause heart problems -- that instead the older drug may actually help protect the heart -- but a study to prove that point has not been done yet. So in September the Food & Drug Administration warned the company that its marketing must acknowledge that it is unclear whether Vioxx poses a cardiac risk. |
| |
| December 2001 |
Consumer Reports on Health, "The COX-2 controversy. Are newer arthritis drugs safer?" |
The newest class of arthritis drugs, called COX-2 inhibitors, is supposedly easier on the stomach than standard medications, such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). That notion has made them by far the best-selling prescription pain relievers. But only one of two large, recent clinical trials clearly supported that idea - and that same trial raised the possibility that the COX-2 drugs may increase the risk of heart attack and stroke. More... |
|
| Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Product Liability Lawyers |
| Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP is an over fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New
York and Nashville. For the last five years, the National Law Journal has
recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs law firms
in America. |
| For our personal injury cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. Each client is assigned a partner and an associate. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist the attorneys. |
| We have represented thousands of patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous undisclosed side effects, and patients who received defective medical devices in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Trademark Notice |
| "Vioxx" is
a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx
trademark is used solely for informational purposes. |
|
|
|
Copyright © 2007 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
| |
|
|
Merck
Agrees to Resolve U.S. VIOXX® Product
Liability Lawsuits
November 9, 2007
Merck & Co., Inc.
announced that
it has entered into
an agreement to resolve
state and federal myocardial
infarction (MI) and
ischemic stroke claims
already filed against
the Company in the
United States. More... |
|
|
|
|