|
|
|
 |
| January 3, 2005 |
Reuters, "Researcher
says 139,000 harmed by Vioxx" |
The
U.S. drug safety officer who warned months ago about risks from Merck & Co.
Inc.'s painkiller Vioxx won clearance to publish a study arguing the
now-recalled drug may have caused up to 139,000 heart attacks and strokes,
his attorney said Monday.
Dr. David Graham is resubmitting
the research to the Lancet medical journal after supervisors at the Food
and Drug Administration granted permission, his attorney, Thomas Devine, said.
Graham, associate director
for science in the FDA's Office of Drug Safety, had withdrawn an earlier version
of the study after agency officials complained he had not received proper clearance,
said Devine, legal director for a whistle-blower protection group called the
Government Accountability Project.
Graham provided his estimates
of harm from Vioxx at a Senate hearing in November. He said he used data from
Merck studies of heart attack and stroke risk and applied them to the number
of Vioxx users over five years. He calculated the drug may have caused between
88,000 and 139,000 excess cases of heart attack and stroke.
Merck pulled Vioxx from
the market on Sept. 30 after a study showed the drug increased heart attack and
stroke risk in patients who took the drug for at least 18 months to try and prevent
colon cancer. The company is facing liability lawsuits from patients and families
alleging harm from the drug. |
|
| Lieff
Cabraser: Experienced Vioxx Injury Lawyers |
| Founded
in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein,
LLP is an over-fifty attorney law firm with
offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville.
In each of the last five years, the National
Law Journal has recognized
Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs law
firms in America. |
| For
our personal injury Vioxx cases, we bring a
team of experienced lawyers. In addition,
we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants,
scientific analysts and case clerks to assist
our Vioxx attorneys. Learn more about advantages
we offer patients with Vioxx problems and
injuries. |
|
|
|
We
have a nationwide team of experienced
injury Vioxx lawyers assigned to Vioxx
trials. |
|
We
provide individual attentive service. Learn
more about our firm. |
|
We
have retained the leading national
medical experts on Vioxx and have
a staff of nurses to assist the
prosecution of the claims of our
clients. |
|
|
|
| We
have been contacted by thousands of Vioxx drug patients
nationwide as part of the Vioxx litigation. We have represented
patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous,
undisclosed side effects in personal injury lawsuits
across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama,
Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut,
Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois,
Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts,
Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana,
North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire,
New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma,
Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee,
Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin,
West Virginia and Wyoming. |
| Persons
living outside the United States who have been injured
by an American product manufactured may also in certain
cases file Vioxx lawsuits for compensation for heart
attacks and strokes in United States courts. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lieff
Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Trademark
Notice |
| "Vioxx"
is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann
& Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck,
and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational
purposes. |
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP |
|
|
|
|
Vioxx
Recall: The international prescription
drug company Merck announced in September
2004 the worldwide withdrawal of the arthritis
medication Rofecoxib, sold in most countries
under the brand name Vioxx, because a study
showed an increased risk of heart attack
and stroke.
Vioxx
Trial: Patients who have suffered
injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation
against Merck for selling Vioxx even though
Merck allegedly was aware of Vioxx's dangerous
side effects. |
|
|
|
|