Graphic: Vioxx Legal Resources.com
Offices

Image: Gavel & Law Books
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

 


Vioxx News Article
July 19, 2005
Associated Press, "Testimony Begins in Vioxx Case; Merck scientist takes the stand -- plaintiffs' lawyers say the firm downplayed safety concerns"
          Merck & Co.'s top epidemiologist took some verbal punches Monday as the plaintiffs' lawyer in the nation's first Vioxx-related lawsuit to go to trial said the company downplayed concerns about the drug's safety for years before taking it off the market in 2004.
          Nancy Santanello, executive director and head of Merck's department of epidemiology and the Whitehorse Station, N.J.-based company's representative at the trial, was the first witness to testify.
          Plaintiffs' attorneys highlighted warning letters Merck received from the Food and Drug Administration about misrepresenting or downplaying concerns about Vioxx in aggressive marketing efforts that included glitzy TV ads.
          Among those was a letter Merck received in September 2001 - two years after Vioxx was introduced to the market with much fanfare - about Vioxx marketing in the aftermath of a 2000 study. The study found some Vioxx users suffered five times as many heart attacks as people who used the older pain reliever naproxen, sold under the brand name Aleve.
          The letter said Merck was engaged in a promotional campaign for Vioxx "that minimizes the potentially serious cardiovascular findings" observed in the study and "misrepresents the safety profile for Vioxx."
          The letter also said Merck's campaign discounted the fact that patients on Vioxx "were observed to have a four-to-fivefold increase in myocardial infarctions," or heart attacks, compared with patients taking naproxen.
          The FDA also challenged Merck's attribution of the disparity to naproxen's cardio-protective qualities: "That is a possible explanation, but you fail to disclose that your explanation is hypothetical, has not been demonstrated by substantial evidence and there is another reasonable explanation, that Vioxx may have pro-thrombotic properties," or the ability to cause blood clots.

Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Vioxx Injury Lawyers
Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is an over-fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. In each of the last five years, the National Law Journal has recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs’ law firms in America.
For our personal injury Vioxx cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist our Vioxx attorneys. Learn more about advantages we offer patients with Vioxx problems and injuries.
OUR PROMISE TO YOU
We have a nationwide team of experienced injury Vioxx lawyers assigned to Vioxx trials.
We provide individual attentive service. Learn more about our firm.
We have retained the leading national medical experts on Vioxx and have a staff of nurses to assist the prosecution of the claims of our clients.
We have been contacted by thousands of Vioxx drug patients nationwide as part of the Vioxx litigation. We have represented patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous, undisclosed side effects in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Persons living outside the United States who have been injured by an American product manufactured may also in certain cases file Vioxx lawsuits for compensation for heart attacks and strokes in United States courts.

Photo: Supreme Court, Gavel & Law Books, Scales, various pill images
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Trademark Notice
"Vioxx" is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational purposes.

Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Vioxx Recall: The international prescription drug company Merck announced in September 2004 the worldwide withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib, sold in most countries under the brand name Vioxx, because a study showed an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

Vioxx Trial: Patients who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation against Merck for selling Vioxx even though Merck allegedly was aware of Vioxx's dangerous side effects.