Graphic: Vioxx Legal Resources.com
Offices

Image: Gavel & Law Books
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

 


Vioxx News Article
July 19, 2005
The New York Times, "At Vioxx Trial, a Discrepancy Appears to Undercut Merck's Defense"
          In a 2001 letter to doctors, Merck seriously understated the heart risks faced by patients taking its painkiller Vioxx, according to evidence presented Tuesday in the first Vioxx lawsuit to reach trial. In the letter, Merck reported that patients taking Vioxx in the largest clinical trial of the drug ever, only 0.5 percent had incurred "cardiovascular events," or heart and circulation problems. That would mean only about 20 patients among the more than 4,000 who took Vioxx during the study.
          But in fact, 14.6 percent of the Vioxx patients -- or 590 people -- had cardiovascular troubles while taking the drug, according to Merck's own report on the study to federal regulators. And 2.5 percent, or 101 people, had serious problems, like heart attacks. Merck sent the letter to thousands of doctors, including in April 2001 to Dr. Brent Wallace, who had prescribed Vioxx to Robert Ernst. Mr. Ernst, who was 59, died suddenly in May 2001 after taking Vioxx for eight months, and his family is suing Merck, claiming the drug caused his death.
          The gap between Merck's internal analysis of the study and its letter to physicians may undercut a crucial aspect of the company's defense: that Merck fully disclosed Vioxx's potential heart risks to doctors and patients during the five years the drug was on the market. Merck stopped selling Vioxx last September after a clinical study disclosed heart risks that the company said were its first conclusive evidence of the drug's safety problems.
          A jury of seven men and five women is hearing the case, Ernst v. Merck, in Brazoria County Courthouse in Angleton, a town of 18,000 about 45 miles south of Houston. The case has attracted national attention as the first of thousands of Vioxx-related lawsuits to reach trial. About 20 million people took Vioxx before Merck stopped selling the drug last fall, and some epidemiologists have estimated that the drug may have been linked to tens of thousands of heart attacks or strokes.

Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Vioxx Injury Lawyers
Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is an over-fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. In each of the last five years, the National Law Journal has recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs’ law firms in America.
For our personal injury Vioxx cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist our Vioxx attorneys. Learn more about advantages we offer patients with Vioxx problems and injuries.
OUR PROMISE TO YOU
We have a nationwide team of experienced injury Vioxx lawyers assigned to Vioxx trials.
We provide individual attentive service. Learn more about our firm.
We have retained the leading national medical experts on Vioxx and have a staff of nurses to assist the prosecution of the claims of our clients.
We have been contacted by thousands of Vioxx drug patients nationwide as part of the Vioxx litigation. We have represented patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous, undisclosed side effects in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Persons living outside the United States who have been injured by an American product manufactured may also in certain cases file Vioxx lawsuits for compensation for heart attacks and strokes in United States courts.

Photo: Supreme Court, Gavel & Law Books, Scales, various pill images
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Trademark Notice
"Vioxx" is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational purposes.

Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Vioxx Recall: The international prescription drug company Merck announced in September 2004 the worldwide withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib, sold in most countries under the brand name Vioxx, because a study showed an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

Vioxx Trial: Patients who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation against Merck for selling Vioxx even though Merck allegedly was aware of Vioxx's dangerous side effects.