Graphic: Vioxx Legal Resources.com
Offices

Image: Gavel & Law Books
Attorney Advertising Disclaimer

 


Vioxx News Article
February 5, 2006
Associated Press, "Journal Article a Wild Card in Vioxx Trial"
          A top medical journal's criticism of a study cited in Vioxx lawsuits is expected to play a part in the retrial of the first federal Vioxx lawsuit — but it's not clear if it will be a legal hand grenade or a nuclear warhead.
          The disclosure that some negative data was omitted from the study could make manufacturer Merck & Co. look as if it's hiding something, legal experts say. That is what attorneys for Evelyn Irvin Plunkett, whose husband died after taking the drug for a month, say they can prove in the trial starting Monday.
          The first federal trial -- held in Houston in the wake of Hurricane Katrina -- ended with a deadlock. Two jurors said the split was 8-1 in favor of Merck's contention that taking Vioxx had nothing to do with the death of Richard "Dickie" Irvin.
          The day those deliberations began, the New England Journal of Medicine published criticism -- one step short of retracting the study -- accusing its authors of withholding and deleting relevant data.
          The information alone is "damaging although not shattering," but its implications could be devastating, Northwestern University law professor Ronald Allen said.
          Vioxx was a $2.5 billion-a-year seller when Merck pulled it from the market in September 2004 because a study found that taking it for 18 months doubled the risk of heart attacks.
          The journal's critique noted that its editors learned that the authors had deleted information about three additional heart attacks not reported in the original study, but reported to the Food and Drug Administration. That would have changed a section about side effects, showing that Vioxx patients had five times as many attacks as those on the pain reliever naproxen, rather than four times as many -- and that patients not considered high-risk were having heart attacks, it said.
          "Taken together, these inaccuracies and deletions call into question the integrity of the data," the journal said.

Lieff Cabraser: Experienced Vioxx Injury Lawyers
Founded in 1972, Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is an over-fifty attorney law firm with offices in San Francisco, New York and Nashville. In each of the last five years, the National Law Journal has recognized Lieff Cabraser as one of the top plaintiffs’ law firms in America.
For our personal injury Vioxx cases, we bring a team of experienced lawyers. In addition, we have on staff multiple nurses, legal assistants, scientific analysts and case clerks to assist our Vioxx attorneys. Learn more about advantages we offer patients with Vioxx problems and injuries.
OUR PROMISE TO YOU
We have a nationwide team of experienced injury Vioxx lawyers assigned to Vioxx trials.
We provide individual attentive service. Learn more about our firm.
We have retained the leading national medical experts on Vioxx and have a staff of nurses to assist the prosecution of the claims of our clients.
We have been contacted by thousands of Vioxx drug patients nationwide as part of the Vioxx litigation. We have represented patients who ingested prescription drugs with dangerous, undisclosed side effects in personal injury lawsuits across America, including residents of Alaska, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Maryland, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, North Carolina, North Dakota, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Nevada, New York, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Vermont, Washington, Wisconsin, West Virginia and Wyoming.
Persons living outside the United States who have been injured by an American product manufactured may also in certain cases file Vioxx lawsuits for compensation for heart attacks and strokes in United States courts.

Photo: Supreme Court, Gavel & Law Books, Scales, various pill images
Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Trademark Notice
"Vioxx" is a registered trademark of Merck. Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP is in no way affiliated with Merck, and the Vioxx trademark is used solely for informational purposes.

Copyright © 2008 Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein, LLP

Vioxx Recall: The international prescription drug company Merck announced in September 2004 the worldwide withdrawal of the arthritis medication Rofecoxib, sold in most countries under the brand name Vioxx, because a study showed an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.

Vioxx Trial: Patients who have suffered injuries due to Vioxx have filed litigation against Merck for selling Vioxx even though Merck allegedly was aware of Vioxx's dangerous side effects.